Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 M330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1200MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M330
659
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+272%
2458
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
955 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Exo
GPU Name
TU117
Exo PRO
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
