Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+91%
5728
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU117
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6