Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
19008 additional rendering cores
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+7849%
81720
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
19456
Shading Units
448
1216
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
247W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
