Radeon Instinct MI300X vs GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2100MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+717%
81720
GRID RTX T10 2
9999
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
19456
Shading Units
3584
1216
TMUs
224
0
ROPs
64
1216
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
150W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
153 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
