Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro FX 770M

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro FX 770M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
19424 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +102050%
81720
Quadro FX 770M
80

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
19456
Shading Units
32
1216
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
35W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net