Radeon Instinct MI300X vs GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+3470%
81720
GRID K260Q
2289
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
1536
1216
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
225W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK104
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
