Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
896
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+139%
2150
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
