Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2350MHz vs 1400MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
896
Arc 140T Mobile
+437%
4813
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2025
Renoir
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
3 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
