Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Iris Graphics 6100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Graphics 6100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1400MHz vs 1000MHz)
Iris Graphics 6100 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
+16%
896
Iris Graphics 6100
768
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Sep 2014
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
6
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
133 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1