Radeon 620 Mobile vs Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2007
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
1024 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
8.192 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
24.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
786.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
786.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
49.15 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Polaris 24
GPU Name
M66
Polaris 24 XL
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0
