Quadro P2000 vs Tesla M60
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 8GB VRAM Tesla M60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1480MHz vs 1178MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Tesla M60 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Tesla M60
+59%
4825
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
2973
Tesla M60
+23%
3661
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM204
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
