Quadro P2000 vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+556%
3031
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
