Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1700MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+1479%
47870
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
40
ROPs
0
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
