Quadro P2000 vs Quadro P1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1519MHz vs 1480MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+94%
3031
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1555
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+107%
2973
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1430
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
+103%
1350
Quadro P1000 Mobile
663
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1493 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.30 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.61 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.30 GFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.555 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.61 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N18P-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
