Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1620MHz vs 1480MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+9%
3318
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
2973
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+8%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
1350
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+11%
1505
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
