Quadro P2000 vs Quadro P600 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1620MHz vs 1480MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+143%
3031
Quadro P600 Mobile
1244
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+153%
2973
Quadro P600 Mobile
1174
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
+141%
1350
Quadro P600 Mobile
559
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1430 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.92 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.88 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.44 GFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.88 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
