Quadro P2000 vs Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+1794%
3031
Quadro FX 3600M
160
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
64
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G92
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
