Quadro P2000 vs Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+3688%
3031
Quadro FX 770M
80
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G96
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
