Quadro P2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2050MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+453%
16790
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
DG2-512
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
