Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+305%
2974
Quadro K2000D
733
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
