Quadro M600M vs Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro M3000M
+219%
2150
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M600M
660
Quadro M3000M
+205%
2016
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
