Quadro M600M vs Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 47W)
Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1480MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Quadro P1000
+181%
1894
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M600M
660
Quadro P1000
+138%
1572
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
47W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
