Quadro M600M vs Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Arctic Sound 2T
+1953%
13820
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
120
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
