Quadro M600M vs Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1700MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+7012%
47870
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
384
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
