Quadro M2000M vs Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+54%
2169
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
