Quadro M2000M vs Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1098MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 245W)
Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1405
Tesla K40c
+259%
5046
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
640
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK180
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
