Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 245W)
Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Tesla K40c
+132%
5046
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
2880
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
245W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
