Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+279%
2169
Quadro K2000M
572
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
