Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+52%
3318
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
40W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
