Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+413%
2169
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
