Quadro K2000 vs Quadro M5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1165MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro M5500 Mobile
+551%
4772
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM204
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
