Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+816%
733
Quadro FX 1600M
80
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G84
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
