Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 370M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+3231%
733
Quadro FX 370M
22
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G98
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
