Quadro K2000 vs RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1078%
8637
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
