Quadro K2000 vs L4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 72W)
L4 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
L4
+4032%
30290
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
60
384
Shading Units
7424
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
72W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
