Quadro K2000 vs Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Arctic Sound M
+1912%
14750
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
