Quadro FX 880M vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
Tesla K20c
+2937%
3524
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2496
16
TMUs
208
8
ROPs
40
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK110
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
