Quadro FX 880M vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2449%
2957
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU117B
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
