Quadro FX 880M vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+7611%
8945
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
20
48
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GP104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
