Quadro FX 880M vs GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
GRID M60 4A
+4059%
4825
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GM204
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
