Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
RTX A2000
+1628%
7987
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
26
192
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
