Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+618%
3318
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
