Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+540%
2957
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
