Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+683%
462
Quadro FX 1700
59
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
