Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro FX 3800
462
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
16
192 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
