Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+6%
462
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
5
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
