Quadro FX 3700 vs GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 400W)
GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
280
GRID A100B
+4860%
13890
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
108
112
Shading Units
6912
56
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA100
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
