Home Comparison Quadro FX 370 vs RTX A500 Embedded

Quadro FX 370 vs RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370
23
RTX A500 Embedded +23673%
5468

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
23.04 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA107S
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net