Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Quadro CX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro CX
+1676%
462
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
16 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GT200B
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
