Quadro FX 360M vs A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
9200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
A10G
+121130%
31520
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
9216
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA102
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
